by Paul Gardiner |
This article postulates that beginning in year 2020, at least six high ranking American officials
committed criminal fraud in a manner that directly or indirectly caused the abuse and deaths
of millions of Americans, the great majority being vulnerable, elderly senior citizens in each
of the 50 states. As described herein, their fraudulent actions appear to meet all the classic
requirements of criminal fraud and thus, cry out to be thoroughly investigated by one or more
American prosecutors, i. e., state Attorneys General or county/local prosecutors.
Upon investigation, if the actions of the officials are found to be criminal, then a grand jury
needs to be convened, indictments issued, and trial by jury to follow. (To avoid probable
retribution, the six individuals are unnamed in this article).
What is criminal fraud? According to one litigation guide, the elements of civil fraud are:
A) A defendant makes a false statement regarding a material fact;
B) The defendant knew or should have known the representation was false;
C) The defendant intended that the representation cause the plaintiff to act on it; and
D) The plaintiff suffers damages in justifiable reliance on the representation.
According to Black’s Law Dictionary, civil fraud becomes a crime when it is a “knowing
misrepresentation of the truth or concealment of a material fact to induce another to act to his or
her detriment.”
Following is a discussion supporting the allegation of criminal fraud:
A-1. The Material Fact: In year 2020, ivermectin (IV) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were
recognized and established as highly effective treatments against the COVID-19 virus.
1) On December 8, 2020, Dr. Pierre Kory, president of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical
CareAlliance, testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental
Affairs, where he reviewed the evidence supporting the use of IV. He stated:
“The data shows the ability of the drug ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with
early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to
help critically ill patients recover— ivermectin is effectively a ‘miracle drug’ against COVID-
19—.”
Dr Kory called upon the government’s medical authorities, including the National Institutes of
Health, Centers for Disease Control, and the Federal Drug Administration “—to urgently review
the latest data and then issue guidelines for physicians, nurse-practitioners, and physician
assistants to prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19.”
Despite publicly identifying IVas a “miracle drug” for the treatment of the COVID-19
virus, Dr Kory indicates that tragically, only one high level official from the CDC, NIH, NIAID, and FDA contacted him about his testimony and the significant benefits of IV for the prevention and treatment of the COVID-19 virus. This official heard a subsequent presentation by Dr Kory about IV, but then elected to take no action regarding Dr Kory’s
findings and recommendations.
Dr Kory’s full testimony can be viewed (.pdf) at:
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/imo/media/doc/Testimony-Kory-2020-12-08.pdf
2) An August 13, 2021 memorandum of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(obtained via Project Veritas) states that IV was “—identified as curative in April 2020”
and “works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and
modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloriquine),
identified April 2020 as curative—.”
A-2 Making a False Statement About the Material Fact. In a 2021 CNN interview (‘Don’t
do it’: Dr. Fauci warns against taking Ivermectin to fight Covid-19 | CNN ), Dr Anthony Fauci
publicly stated: “—there’s no evidence whatsoever that it works and it could potentially have
toxicity… with people who have gone to poison control centers because they’ve taken the
drug at a ridiculous dose and wind up getting sick,” he said. “There’s no clinical evidence that
indicates that this works.”
In December 2021, the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) published an advisory notice
stating that “The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or
prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or
effective for these indications.” (Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent
COVID-19 | FDA )
B. Knowing the Statement Was False. Due to the public testimony in December 2020 of
Dr Pierre Kory before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
attesting to the effectiveness of IV against the COVID-19 virus, the six high ranking
American officials mentioned earlier must have known or should have known that the
statements of Dr Fauci and the FDA described above were false.
Because IV and HCQ were not recognized as effective treatments against the
COVID-19 virus, the FDA Commissioner was able to issue an Emergency Use
Authorization for the public use of mRNA “vaccines”. The commissioner must
have known or should have known about the effectiveness of IV (and HCQ) against
the virus.
None of the six officials at issue made any known public statements in opposition to the false
statements made by Dr Fauci and the FDA. Regrettably, the false statements were allowed to be interpreted as true statements by the general public.
C. Inducing the Plaintiff to Act on the Statement. In February 2021, in describing three
available COVID-19 mRNA “vaccines”, Dr Fauci publicly stated that “All three of them are
really quite good, and people should take the one that’s most available to them—if you go to
a place and you have J&J, and that’s the one that’s available now, I would take it,” Fauci said.
“I personally would do the same thing. I think people need to get vaccinated as quickly and as
expeditiously as possible.” (Fauci: All three Covid vaccines highly effective, urges people to
take available shot (cnbc.com) Dr Fauci failed to mention the effectiveness of IV or HCQ
against the COVID-19 virus.
The FDA advisory notice mentioned above states that “The most effective ways to limit the
spread of COVID-19 include getting a COVID-19 vaccine when it is available to you and
following current CDC guidance.” These is no mention of the effectiveness of IV or HCQ
against the COVID-19 virus.
D. Plaintiff Suffers Damages in Justifiable Reliance in the Statement. The “damages”
caused by the aforementioned fraud amount to human damages in terms of egregious
suffering and death of millions Americans, the great majority being vulnerable, elderly senior
citizens in hospitals, nursing homes, etc. In Florida, for instance, Department of Health
statistics indicate that as of August 3, 2023, over 89,000 Floridians (victims) had perished due
to the COVID-19 virus and/or covid-related issues including treatments received/not received
in hospitals and other facilities. Of the total number of deaths, 76,247 individuals were elderly
Floridians age 60 and over, accounting for approximately 86 percent of total covid deaths.
Thousands of these unfortunate victims relied on fraudulent advice; namely, they either (1)
did not seek effective treatment against the COVID-19 virus via use of the “miracle drug” IV
(or other effective off-label drugs such as HCQ); or (2) they and their physicians encountered
horrific harassment and/or threats of legal action against them if IV was prescribed.
In conclusion, publicly available evidence indicates that several high ranking American officials
committed criminal fraud in their blatant disregard for the safety and well being of millions of
Americans, especially vulnerable, elderly senior citizens who perished due directly or indirectly
to the fraudulent actions of these officials. Among other things, effective, safe early treatments
for COVID-19 (IV and HCQ) were purposely and deliberately disregarded in favor of
experimental mRNA “vaccines” and dangerous, toxic drugs (such as remdesivir) that became
essential toxic components of hospital treatment protocols.
It is past time for justice to be served in this matter, and it is hoped that at least one brave state or
county prosecutor will step forward and thoroughly investigate the above evidence and
circumstances which, if substantiated, will lead to grand jury indictments.
Paul S Gardiner is a retired US Army officer, Vietnam veteran, and avid lover of America. He is a
graduate of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Alabama, and the US Army War College.